China’s one-year ban on ivory-what does it mean?

DSCF8777

photo: Tisha Wardlow/Fight for Rhinos

China’s State Forestry Administration said in a statement posted on its website that it would “temporarily prohibit” trophy imports until Oct. 15, 2016 and “suspend the acceptance of relevant administrative permits”.

Chinese media quoted the “relevant SFA official” as saying the temporary suspension was designed to give authorities time to evaluate its effectiveness, and possibly take further, more effective measures in future.

Are they feeling the pressure from the rest of the world? Are they serious about trying to make a difference? What good does a year do?

Pardon the skepticism, but let’s look at China’s track record.

“In 2002, China was the principal driver of the illegal trade and made very few seizures,” said Tom Milliken, director of eastern and southern African operations for Traffic, which monitors the trade and advises Cites.

In 2008 South Africa initiated a one-off sale of stored ivory. This brief sale, though legal, renewed interest and increased demand within the Chinese culture. Ivory prices skyrocketed, but the “legal supply” was exhausted. Immediately following this sale, according to CITES, “record levels of ivory were seized and sustained throughout the period 2009 to 2011.”

In January of 2014 and May of 2015 China destroyed ivory in a public crush. Yet China officially sanctions 36 ivory-carving workshops. Every year they assign a quota of 5 to 6 tons of “legal” ivory to the carving industry.

Counterproductive to say the least.

In fact according to the Environmental Investigation Agency, when you talk to the ivory dealers they say that amount of allocation only lasts one month. And so the other 11 months is illegal ivory. In an undercover investigation, the carvers admit “at least 90% of the ivory in China is illegal.”

ivory carving brent stirton

One of 36 ivory carving factories in China. photo: Brent Stirton

To think there will be no compromise to said “prohibition” within the year or that the government won’t deem the ban suddenly unnecessary is unrealistic.

But if there is a silver lining it is this: the very fact the  government feels compelled to alter a centuries old tradition by this display means they are feeling the world pressure. There is hope.

 

 

 

 

 

Categories: Rhino Ramblings | Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 5 Comments

Post navigation

5 thoughts on “China’s one-year ban on ivory-what does it mean?

  1. mandy cox

    Prohibition in this instance serves to push the value of the carvings even higher on the back of perceived scarcity. Sickening duplicity.

  2. 12months is a Joke, but maybe the laugh will be on China when we refuse to buy ANYTHING MADE IN CHINA, FOOD, CLOTHES, CARS, IVORY,SOY SAUCE GOT THE PICTURE. See how long the rich Papa Sons think they are doing the American customers a favor. Their art would look good on plastic, they copying everything else into a knock off version, why not get creative China use plastic for carving your junk out of it, like you do with fake Jade and jewelry junk stuff. Plastic Knock off is the new Ivory.

  3. ravenskeeper

    Reblogged this on Ravens-Tree.com and commented:
    The message of the plight of the worlds wild animals needs to get to the people of China themselves. They need to see the horror for themselves. Media/news/ is restricted and censored, so sensitive issues and world wide pressures are repressed. More direct exposure directly to the people is needed. Lets hope this can be achieved.

  4. The ban on Ivory by China, what does it mean? Answer: NOTHING.
    This is just Madison avenue PR stuff. 12 months when they have years of ivory back log to crave, trade black market, sell is just a joke. They are the most invasive, destructive force on the earth not only against their own people, but the world and all the animals on earth. They need to have their country’s political members photo posted as #1 World enemy of earth and her resources. Ban all imports, exports, trade, aid, stop sending US jobs to them. in short they are not fit to sit at the UN table.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Blog at WordPress.com.

%d bloggers like this: